who has a friend keeps a treasure. I have always believed and still maintain. I have reasons to think so. "Because you're a Purete , man. You are outdated. That phrase is out of circulation. The best friend is oneself. Get it on the head. Only
selfish as my nephew Lolo and his friend Miki can be expressed thereby. I have a great friend in this newspaper. Do not know him personally , as I do Chaves , Ayala and Racine, but I think it is true, strictly, that of "by their works you shall know them." About two years ago I emailed (I think so named because it calls Inma ) that illuminated me:
"Remember, Don Carlos, after the close of the question marks and admiration should not be placed point. See
Academy Grammar (l999 edition) and it became clear that the thought my friend went to church incognito because the Academy said amen. So I decided, since then, and for my own sake, refrain from placing items where they should. Now my friend has become the newspaper to give me a favor. Most meritorious, if possible, because it merely corrected an error, without boast. It fulfilled that which says: "Let your left hand does not know what you've done right," a phrase that is exciting because it makes a good work without the presumption.
I told them once, probably two years ago, I never liked my job in literary works of the so-called verbal periphrasis. Just because I'm not so euphonious sounds, nothing else. You know that one often take her dislike to certain words, certain phrases, certain turns. To me, at least, I think. I assure you of circumlocution and I do not have other connotations. The truth is that I never write but simply must be must be. And do not write must have gone out, but should have left. Well
In my article two or three weeks ago, which reminded me of my first teachers, Dona Rosita RodrĂguez de la Sierra and Dona Carmen Rivero Labrador, first wrote "The faculty must have seemed more sad that the school" and my unknown friend chose to write "She should be." A few lines down, where I had written "The teacher should be now in Heaven", my friend opted for "should be." Sure it is correct that the books and dictionaries. But I never found out.
What surprised me most was that all this time I informed my friend the newspaper, but, after reading my article, change detected at the time. I said to myself: who I be inoculated this virus, if the virus is inoculated, which leads me to hate the verbal periphrasis? Then I decided to consult Panhispánico , dear friend who can also be trusted because it does not fold. The dictionary is extended enough in their explanations and I'll tell you something I read. Just something, not to bore you with my inveterate errors.
b) Duty to + infinitive .- Denotes probability or presumption: "The old must have gone." However, in this sense, the cultural language also supports the use without a preposition: Marion, his daughter, must be about twenty years "(Vargas Llosa," Fiesta ", Peru, 2000).
not think that I am against my friend incognito. Quite the contrary. I owe a lot and I should not pay with counterfeit currency. The work of the grammarian, hidden out of humility, courage is. Now there is to know if I can convince myself that the paraphrase is not a useless ornament, but needed to be more consistent with the provisions for those in authority to correct us. Dificilillo see it because I belong to the masses, not the small team of great intellectuals. And the vulgar wrote the great Lope de Vega words like these: "The common people is a fool. And it pays, it is fair to speak to him like a fool to give. "
I certify that the above sentence is the great Lope , but do not ask me what book. Copying a day and there are now helping words. The words of the great writers, thinkers, philosophers? we keep them after reading them carefully. can clarify confusing situations.
And that's what it was given.
CARLOS GARCIA ACOSTA , PUBLISHED IN DAY (SANTA CRUZ DE TENERIFE ), 07/11/2009.
0 comments:
Post a Comment