In a court ruling that no record at the local level, a judge ordered Rosario Family fee increase food that a parent must pass on to their children because they failed to twins visitation. According to the request made by the mother, the absence of forced to disburse extra money on entertainment, food and transportation, which at least eight days a month it was up to her husband.
The ruling is novel, as in court cases of divorce or separation and quotas agreed after food, it is common for parents handled the suspension or reduction of the amount, almost always overwhelmed by the job insecurity . In this case the opposite happened.
A lawyer mother of twins four years, separated since 2006, asked the Justice increased alimony. He said his former partner did not meet with visitors, which would have allowed oxygenation, at least for a few days, domestic coffers.
After separation Susan H. and Edgardo S. they agreed a fee of 800 pesos a month and visits to the children three times a week. The amount "today is not sufficient for the loss of purchasing power and rising living costs," said the applicant before Judge Richard Dutton, the Appellate Court Family No. 5.
in March 2009 agreed to further assessment and visitation, the latter at the request of the father: 1,000 pesos from August to October and 1,300 dollars from December to February 2010. The man promised to remove children on Saturdays and Sundays at ten and reintegrate cenados the same day, weekend through.
However, she alleged that served only three days the agreement. He said that lack paternal resulted in higher economic costs, "which includes eight meals, four snacks and eight dinners a month, plus the cost of leisure, recreation, transportation, nanny to help care for them in the cinema or players, the fixed costs of 1,000 pesos was considered to be incurred by the parent.
So, asked to meet the costs of non-compliance makes the visits, the food included in the 600 pesos at the time of the agreement retroactive.
The father rejected the increase and denied that I would not care for their children. He argued that he saw "when the mother is permitted" The visit "on the weekends he worked in Santa Fe" and could not hold it because he traveled to the United States for work.
compensate. "While the dedication and responsibility should be equal for the upbringing, education and maintenance of two children about the roles of mother and father, when there is full support for the first time and completely detached from the second, must offset by a commensurate alimony, at least, supplement the misunderstanding and reward your keeper for almost total responsibility is in relation to children, "said the magistrate.
Thus, the Tribunal decided to set additional food in character by Father 580 pesos per month, retroactive from August 2009 to March 2010.
0 comments:
Post a Comment