Friday, January 28, 2011

Linsey Dawn And Sister Free Clips

JORDI PUJOL

the distant In February 2008 I published an article harshly criticizing drift independence of the former president of Catalonia, Mr. Pujol, the same time, it reproached one of his most incendiary harangues in which he encouraged his fellow Jews to that when he thought the militants of PP and PSOE are imagined as if they had them spit (sic). He noted in this article that he would no doubt one of the most responsible in the unlikely event that the situation of Wine and Roses became in blood and tears.



How can there Journalists are surprised at their recent demonstrations in which he expresses unambiguously the absence of arguments and to counter the secession of Catalonia? But did not know the history of its political thought? One thing that many will seem a simple thing, is there anyone who has read carefully the statements of his wife Marta Ferrusola over time? Ignore the influence of a woman in her husband's opinion, is to ignore the temper of the English woman is more Catalan; about it I encourage you to read the book The wolves of the Escorial Michel del Castillo.



Mr Mas, son Pujol bucolic, does his father has taught political ... continue working, slowly but inexorably, by and for the independence of Catalonia. On this character I recommend reading one of my articles: Benvingut, Seyor More ... so they know what we're talking about.



If a naive, as former Socialist Minister Jordi Sevilla, believes that with a federal state is going to solve the Catalan problem, I would recommend to study a little more history.





Tuesday, January 18, 2011

Sample Letter Disconnection Of Water Line

ADDRESS UNDIGNIFIED

The farewell speech of the now former president of the misnamed Constitutional Court (TC) has been the ethical standards that we have used this law graduate who made his first steps "political" the hand of his socialist Peces Barba as Vice-Rector in Universidad Carlos III.

In 1998 he was elected judge of the TC and in 2004 its President. With his appointment starts escalating politicization unparalleled in the history of this Court to get approval soon, with social support, an amendment to the Organic Act that established the TC automatically extended from his post as not appropriate to renewal of the Court, modifying "de facto" Article 160 of the Constitution, which stipulated that the House should elect the president of the Court every three years ... but that is the Constitution these "corrupt" but a dead piece of paper is valid only when serving their own interests or those of his party.

In 2006 he was challenged by the Popular Party in the constitutional challenge on the Catalan Statute when a newspaper disclosed that her husband, former judge of the TC also Jesus Leguizamon, had been hired by the Government to participate in drafting the text of the statute and thus prevent it from being declared unconstitutional, the politicized plenary rejected the challenge.

Focusing on his speech, he was being kind, a mass of nonsense that some of his phrases brushed stupidity, but after all describe the character. Among the many criticisms that poured only highlight, not to tire, three, in the first place are the politicians, mainly due to the delay in the renovation of TC which is not surprising to her having been the first to find a way to keep his post as long as possible.

also criticized those who attacked the Court issued its ruling on the Catalan Statute ... "So it was drafted between the Government, her husband and herself "what do you expect this good lady?, a standing ovation for nearly four years after wasting time just got an unacceptable" political statement "which received 6 votes in favor and 4 votes impeccable individuals against and where it shows the Catalan government's roadmap for its independence from Spain; brave fool!

Finally, with a nod to the feminist politics of Zapatero, criticized the fact that among appointed four new members there is only one woman, where is the problem?, is it illegal?, was there any other woman who was better than appointed? If so read their names.

unworthy In short a speech that has only helped to tarnish more, if possible, the prestige of the so-called Constitutional Court.